USPTO serial 98527508
$FLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with $FLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brooke Erdos Singer
Brooke Erdos Singer Davis+Gilbert LLP1675 Broadway, 31st FloorNew York, NY 10019United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software platforms for minting non-fungible tokens NFTs) and for use in managing and processing loyalty and rewards program transactions for restaurants and their customers for purchase discounts, upgrades and perks, namely, guaranteed restaurant reservations and access to special events and special menu items, using blockchain technology; downloadable computer software tools for minting non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and for use in managing and processing loyalty and rewards program transactions for restaurants and their customers for purchase discounts, upgrades and perks, namely, guaranteed restaurant reservations and access to special events and special menu items, using blockchain technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for minting non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and for use in managing and processing loyalty and rewards program transactions for restaurants and their customers for purchase discounts, upgrades and perks, namely, guaranteed restaurant reservations and access to special events and special menu items, using blockchain technology; providing a website featuring n-line non-downloadable software tools for minting non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and for use in managing and processing loyalty and rewards program transactions for restaurants and their customers for purchase discounts, upgrades and perks, namely, guaranteed restaurant reservation and access to special events and special menu items, using blockchain technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2026 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |