USPTO serial 98528765
PHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHMIDT, JOHN JOSEPH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Des Moines, IA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Breiner
David M. Breiner BrownWinick Law Firm666 Grand Ave Suite 2000Des Moines, IA 50309United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing online employment information in the field of Human Resources; Providing employment history information to online community of users; Payroll processing services; Providing employment history information and employment verification of employee and contractor candidate's work histories and experience to online users; Payroll administration and management services; professional Personnel Staffing and Recruiting services; Organizing and hosting virtual and in-person job fairs and events in the nature of job fairs in the field of employment and focused on hiring personnel | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for recruitment, hiring, on-boarding, offer management, video interviewing and organizing the hiring and applicant tracking process for employers and employees; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for sourcing and screening candidates, scheduling interviews, allowing access to employers to conduct interviews, and communicate with candidates; software as a service (SaaS) provider featuring software in the field of human resources management; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software allowing online community of users to schedule, conduct interviews, and communicate with potential employees and contractors; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for allowing online community of users to verify work history and experience of potential employees and/or contractors; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for allowing online community of users to seek potential employees and/or contractors based on user's needs and the employee's and/or contractor's work experience and expertise | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |