Drawing for SUNNY MIST

USPTO serial 98530541

SUNNY MIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 612
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUNNY MIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane B Melnick

Diane B Melnick Practus LLPP.O. Box 1101New York, NY 10075United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruits; Fresh vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2026PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 29, 2026APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 21, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2026PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 18, 2026TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 18, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 18, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 18, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 3, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance