USPTO serial 98536704
OPENGPU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUK, HAE P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPENGPU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason C. Palmer
Jason C. Palmer Palmer Law, PLC1201 Liberty PikeSuite 229Franklin, TN 37067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software development tools | ACTIVE | Jun 21, 2021 |
| 042 | Computer hardware design; Computer hardware development; Computer hardware and software design; Computer software design; Computer software design for others; Computer software design services; Computer software development; Computer software development in the field of neuromorphic computation, neural radiance field rendering, machine learning, neural networks, and artificial intelligence; Computer programming and software design; Design and development of computer hardware; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Design and writing of computer software; Design of computer hardware, integrated circuits, communications hardware and software and computer networks for others; Design of computer programs and software relating to aircraft; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Developing computer software; Development of computer hardware for computer games; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Design and development of computer game software; Research and development of computer software; Research, development, design and upgrading of computer software; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of neuromorphic computation, neural radiance field rendering, machine learning, neural networks, and artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | Jun 21, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2026 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2025 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2024 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |