USPTO serial 98543950
MIDLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIDLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dieppe, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
Andrew S. Ehard Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Courier transportation logistics services, namely, planning and scheduling shipments for users of transportation services; transportation logistics services, namely, arranging the transportation of goods for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Courier services; delivery of goods by truck; freight transportation by truck; refrigerated storage; supply chain logistics and reverse logistics services consisting of the transportation of goods for others by truck; truck transport; warehousing services; warehousing services, namely, providing the storage, distribution, pick-up, packing, and shipping of a wide variety of consumer goods; distribution services, namely, delivery of freight by means of truck transportation; transportation of goods in refrigerated conditions by truck | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |