USPTO serial 98551401
MIMETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OESTREICHER, SALIMA PARMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MIMETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Connarn
Jessica Connarn Sinorica LLC dba Thoughts to Paper20251 Century Blvd Ste 140Germantown, MD 20874United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Functional cosmetics being skin care preparations; Beauty masks; Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; Patches containing sun screen and sun block for use on the skin; Sheet masks for neck for cosmetic use; Gel eye masks; Pores tightening mask packs used as cosmetics; Sheet masks for the body for cosmetic use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | gauze for dressings,;sticking plasters; bandages for dressings; surgical bandages; drugs, namely patches, plasters, adhesive tapes for medical purposes; medicines namely tablets, capsules, powders for human purposes; adhesive tapes for medical purposes; plasters for medical purposes; patch for dressing namely hydrocolloid patches, hydrogel patches, silicone gel patches; pad for dressing namely non-woven absorbent pads, polyurethane foam pads, alginate pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cosmetic utensils namely tweezers, spatulas, facial rolloers, eyelash curlers; Cosmetic brushes for applying make-up; Microdermabrasion sponges for cosmetic use; Cosmetic apparatus for microdermabrasion; Powder compacts sold empty; Cosmetic stamps; Vibrating applicator for applying foundation make-up namely vibrating silicone puff, sonic vibrating sponge; Electric brushes for make-up namely electric foundation brush, electric contour brush; Electric facial sponges for applying make-up namely rotating silicone sponge, electric cushion puff; Electric compact for cosmetics namely LED-assisted compact, heated compact case | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 21, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |