USPTO serial 98556797
KEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Candice E. Kim, Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Candice E. Kim, Greenberg Traurig, LLP Greenberg Traurig, LLP1840 Century Park East, Suite 1900Los Angeles, CA 90067United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Vehicle security systems comprised of electric relays, On-board Diagnostics-Second Generation (OBD II) adapters, and downloadable mobile applications for the monitoring, tracking and analysis of vehicle movement, location, status, and behavior; electronic vehicle tracking devices; electronic vehicle performance monitoring devices; electronic vehicle lock system comprised of electric relays, On-board Diagnostics-Second Generation (OBDII) adapters, and downloadable mobile applications for the monitoring, tracking and analysis of vehicle movement, location, status, and behavior | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Electrical anti-theft installations for vehicles; vehicle anti-theft devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |