USPTO serial 98557534
ASTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Watsonville, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for connecting and building multi-step integrations with web-based applications for individual creators and personal productivity; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for accessing and integrating data for creative workflows, creating multi-step workflows among applications for content creation, and handling complex logic across multiple applications for independent users; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for finding, creating, editing, and managing audio/visual content, namely text, images, audio, and video, for creative projects and digital content creation; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for workflow automation and management specifically for creative content production, personal media projects, and individual task optimization; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for creative workflow automation, creating, editing, and managing audio/visual content for individual expression and content creation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |