USPTO serial 98563214
REGIIS TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REGIIS TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaitlyn Haven
Kaitlyn Haven Kunzler Bean & Adamson, PC50 W Broadway, Suite 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Air powered tools, namely, tools, such as drills, screwdrivers, rivet hammers, saws; Bits for power drills; Chisels for machines; Electric gate openers; Electric rotary hammers; Electric sanders; Electronically and power-operated tools, namely, pullers and components therefor, nut splitters, extractors, separators, spanners and coil spring compressors; Hydraulically actuated tools, namely, tools, pliers, hammers; Laser engraving machines; Machine parts, namely, blades; Pipe cleaning machines; Power-operated grass/weed trimmers; Power drill accessories, namely, non-electrical adapters for use in joining extensions and power drill bits; Power drill bit extensions; Swimming pool sweepers; Tool bits for machines | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |