Drawing for ARTIFICIAL GENERAL DECISION MAKING

USPTO serial 98570722

ARTIFICIAL GENERAL DECISION MAKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, OLIVIA SUNMIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTIFICIAL GENERAL DECISION MAKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charlene A. Azema

Charlene A. Azema Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Downloadable computer programs using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Recorded computer programs using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Recorded computer software using artificial intelligence for use in decision makingACTIVE—
042Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for use in decision makingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 18, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 17, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance