USPTO serial 98570722
ARTIFICIAL GENERAL DECISION MAKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, OLIVIA SUNMIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTIFICIAL GENERAL DECISION MAKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene A. Azema
Charlene A. Azema Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Downloadable computer programs using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Recorded computer programs using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Recorded computer software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for use in decision making | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |