USPTO serial 98571724
TECHNOLOGY REIMAGINED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY REIMAGINED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard I. Sobelman
Howard I. Sobelman Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.1 E. Washington StreetSuite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Providing technology solutions and information technology services, namely hardware installation; Managed services for data centers, namely, hardware repair and maintenance services for computers and servers for the purpose of keeping the computers and servers current with upgrades and device set-up services. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Electronic cloud storage service for archiving electronic data; User support in the nature of remote management of the information technology of others; Testing of security systems; Computer security consultancy; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing, namely cloud assessments in the nature of assessing the architecture of a network for preparation for migration from on-premises infrastructure to a virtual cloud environment; Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data, namely identifying vulnerabilities and issues in a cloud environment, networks and applications, uncovering network behavior anomalies and identifying vulnerabilities and issues in a network for the purpose of preparing to upgrade the technology infrastructure, processes and performance; Computer project management services for data centers; Computer monitoring service which tracks hardware performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts; Computer monitoring service which tracks application software performance, performs periodic maintenance and provides reports and alerts concerning such performance in the nature of providing computer uptime data; Software application security testing; Computer software behavior anomaly detection, software host intrusion detection, software file integrity monitoring. | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing security surveillance of premises for businesses; Security guard services. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |