USPTO serial 98577818
KLARITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, TRENTON MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLARITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Boyana Bounkova
Boyana Bounkova Suter Law, PC61G Avenida De Orinda, Suite GOrinda, CA 94563United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for automation of workflow by reviewing customer contracts, extracting key terms from them, displaying them to users within the software's interface and transmitting them to third-party systems; Providing subscription-based temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for automation of workflow by reviewing customer contracts, extracting key terms from them, displaying them to users within the software's interface and transmitting them to third-party systems; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence for automation of workflow by reviewing customer contracts, extracting key terms from them, displaying them to users within the software's interface and transmitting them to third-party systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for automation of workflow by reviewing customer contracts, extracting key terms from them, displaying them to users within the software's interface and transmitting them to third-party systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for automation of workflow by reviewing customer contracts, extracting key terms from them, displaying them to users within the software's interface and transmitting them to third-party systems | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |