USPTO serial 98577934
AIRGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BACZESKI, LILLIANNA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carissa L. Weiss
Carissa L. Weiss Law Office of Carissa L. Weiss, PLLC745 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500New York, NY 10151United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Downloadable computer software, namely, software development tools for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Downloadable computer software development tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of cloud-based, non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Providing temporary use of cloud-based, non-downloadable software, namely, software development tools for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Providing temporary use of cloud-based, non-downloadable software development tools; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for creating robotic and autonomous vehicle artificial intelligence-based algorithms; Research in the fields of artificial intelligence and robotics; Technology consultation in the fields of artificial intelligence and robotics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |