USPTO serial 98579971
S STORI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with S STORI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erik M. Pelton
Erik M. Pelton Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLCPO Box 100637Arlington, VA 22210United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | savings account administration; savings and loan institutions; deposit savings services; financial services related to savings; savings plan services; bank account and savings account services; bank account and savings account services; savings bank services; savings and loan services; credit and debit card issuance; payment processing; debit card payment processing; financial services related to the issuance of bank cards and debit cards; credit and debit card services debit; credit and debit card services; deposit taking; collection of payments for products and services; remote payment services; financial transfer and transaction services; payment services; electronic wallet services (payment services); electronic payment processing; electronic payment processing; financial analysis; financial consulting; financial management; providing financial information; capital and fund immersion; financing of loans; banking services; credit agency services; services of financing; electronic transfers of funds; credit production through cards; credit services through financial companies; financial analysis in the field of credit underwriting; banking services through remote access, namely, banking in home through web-based or mobile banking applications; credit card services, namely, issuance and administration of credit cards; debit card services, namely, issuance and administration of debit cards; insurance consulting; financial consulting; credit agencies; issuance of credit cards; issuance of traveler's checks; issuance of securities; lending services in the field of unsecured loans for consumers and small/medium-sized businesses; financial information and advisory services; electronic transfer of funds; investment of funds for third parties; financial settlement services, namely, debt resolution services in the nature of credit card debt settlement and elimination; foreign exchange transactions; budget planning services for third parties; savings banking services; insurance services, namely underwriting of accident, fire, health, life and marine insurance; insurance brokerage in the field of accident, fire, health, life and marine insurance; actuarial services; insurance underwriting and administration services on commercial guarantees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |