CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BINARY DEFENSE ARC LABS

USPTO serial 98589833

BINARY DEFENSE ARC LABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VELTEN, MALLORY KATE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BINARY DEFENSE ARC LABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan E. Clady

Susan E. Clady Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP127 Public SquareSuite 4900Cleveland, OH 44114-1284

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable webinars in the fields of cybersecurity, cyber threats, cyber threat mitigation, and cyber threat responseACTIVE—
041Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of reports, articles, newsletters, and brochures in the fields of cybersecurity, cyber threats, cyber threat mitigation, and cyber threat response; Education services, namely, providing non-downloadable webinars in the fields of cybersecurity, cyber threats, cyber threat mitigation, and cyber threat responseACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing security to computers and IT infrastructure; computer security services in the nature of IT security to proactively look for threats to computers and IT infrastructure; Computer network security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; computer security consultancy in the field of cybersecurity, cyber threats, cyber threat mitigation, and cyber threat response; Computer and internet security services, namely, the provision of managed security services in the nature of detection, investigation, and response to cybersecurity threats; Computer and internet security services, namely, the provision of cybersecurity vulnerability management services, technology consulting, and advisory services in the field of cybersecurityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2024MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance