USPTO serial 98590490
BLOCK OUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 807Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUK, HAE P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with BLOCK OUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEXANDER S. PERRY
ALEXANDER S. PERRY Blank Rome LLP1825 Eye Street NWWashington, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Opaque light blocking plastic flexible packaging film sold in bulk to commercial and industrial manufacturers; light blocking plastic films used as packaging for food; heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on food packaging; light blocking plastic stickers for labeling products; light blocking plastic films used as packaging for commercial purposes; heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on packaging for commercial purposes; light blocking plastic films used as packaging, namely clear plastic films with light blocking elements for commercial purposes; heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on packaging, namely clear plastic films with light blocking elements for commercial purposes; recyclable light blocking plastic films used as packaging for commercial purposes; recyclable heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on packaging food | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | light blocking adhesive-backed plastic films for use in the manufacture of durable labels; light blocking plastic films for use in the manufacture of product labels; recyclable light blocking plastic films for use in the manufacture of product labels | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | light blocking plastic films for use on food packages and labeling; heat shrinkable plastic labels containing light blocking elements for use on food packaging; light blocking plastic product labels; light blocking plastic product labels, namely clear plastic labels with light blocking coatings; light blocking plastic films for use on packaging for commercial purposes; recyclable light blocking plastic product labels; recyclable light blocking plastic films for use on packaging for commercial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brook & Whittle Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Brook & Whittle Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named BLOCK OUT
- Prosecution event GNRN explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 11, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |