USPTO serial 98590492
BLOCKOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIU, PHILIP
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLOCKOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEXANDER S PERRY
ALEXANDER S PERRY BLANK ROME LLP1825 EYE STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Opaque light blocking plastic flexible packaging film for commercial and industrial purposes sold in bulk to commercial and industrial manufacturers; light blocking plastic films used for packaging for food; heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on food packaging; light blocking plastic stickers for labeling products; light blocking plastic films used for foodstuff packaging; heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on foodstuff packaging; clear light blocking plastic films used on food packaging featuring light blocking elements; clear heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on food packaging featuring light blocking elements; recyclable light blocking plastic films used for foodstuff packaging; recyclable heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on foodstuff packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | light blocking adhesive-backed plastic films for use in the manufacture of durable labels; light blocking plastic films for use in the manufacture of product labels; recyclable light blocking plastic films for use in the manufacture of product labels | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Heat shrinkable plastic labels containing light blocking elements for use on food packaging; light blocking plastic product labels; light blocking plastic product labels with light blocking coatings; recyclable light blocking plastic product labels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |