USPTO serial 98590498
BLOCKOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUK, HAE P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLOCKOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEXANDER S. PERRY
ALEXANDER S. PERRY BLANK ROME LLP1825 EYE STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Opaque light blocking plastic flexible packaging film sold in bulk to commercial and industrial manufacturers; light blocking plastic films used as packaging for food; heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on food packaging; light blocking plastic stickers for labeling products; light blocking plastic films used as packaging; heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on packaging; light blocking plastic films used as packaging, namely clear plastic films with light blocking elements; heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on packaging, namely clear plastic films with light blocking elements; recyclable light blocking plastic films used as packaging; recyclable heat shrinkable plastic films containing light blocking elements for use on packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | light blocking adhesive-backed plastic films for use in the manufacture of durable labels; light blocking plastic films for use in the manufacture of product labels; recyclable light blocking plastic films for use in the manufacture of product labels | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | light blocking plastic films for use on food packages and labeling; heat shrinkable plastic labels containing light blocking elements for use on food packaging; light blocking plastic product labels; light blocking plastic product labels, namely clear plastic labels with light blocking coatings; light blocking plastic films for use on product packaging; recyclable light blocking plastic product labels; recyclable light blocking plastic films for use on product packaging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |