USPTO serial 98595966
PRANCER DECENTRALIZED OFFENSIVE SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRANCER DECENTRALIZED OFFENSIVE SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA, US
San Diego, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Stoller
1717 N. Bayshore Dr. Suite 213Miami, FL 33132United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing on-line, non-downloadable software for advanced cybersecurity testing tools and techniques that provide tools and resources that require minimal specialized knowledge and educational resources and training to enable users to conduct their own security assessments, and encouraging open-source contributions and collaboration; computer consulting services, namely, computer programming consultancy, computer security consultancy, all in the field of cybersecurity; computer testing services, namely, testing of computer hardware, testing of computer software, testing of computer performance, all in the field of cybersecurity; research and development in the fields of computer software and computer network security all in the field of cybersecurity; computer software and network security management and analysis, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems and networks of others all in the field of cybersecurity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |