USPTO serial 98597275
DAD BOD BOWLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITROS, CATHERINE SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAD BOD BOWLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Las Vegas, NV, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | (Based on Use) Shirts; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; Shirts for infants, babies, toddlers and children; Athletic shirts; Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Clothing, namely, bowling attire, namely, shirts, pants, shorts; Collared shirts; Graphic T-shirts; Hooded sweat shirts; Knit shirts; Moisture-wicking sports shirts; Polo shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Sport shirts; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; T-shirts for bowling; Tee shirts; Tee-shirts; Tops as clothing; Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirts; Women's clothing, namely, shirts, dresses, skirts, blouses (Based on Intent to Use) Pants; Shorts; Athletic pants; Athletic shorts; Dress pants; Golf shorts; Gym shorts; Jogging pants; Stretch pants; Sweat pants; Sweat shorts; Walking shorts; Yoga pants | ACTIVE | Jun 9, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |