USPTO serial 98602061
TIB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PETTICAN, NATHANIEL VINCIENT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
Brent E. Routman Merchant & Gould P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LCD (liquid crystal display) apparatus; LCD panels; organic light-emitting diodes (OLED); OLED display apparatus; OLED (Organic light emitting diode) display panels; transparent conductive film for OLED display; notebook computers; display screens being video screens; digital signage; LED monitors; video screens; on -board computers being navigation apparatus for vehicles; head-up display apparatus being transparent electronic displays for vehicles; smartwatches; smartphones; organic light-emitting diode displays; electric control panels being instrument panels; computers; tablet PCs; televisions009: LCD (liquid crystal display) apparatus; LCD panels; organic light-emitting diodes (OLED); OLED display apparatus; OLED (Organic light emitting diode) display panels; transparent conductive film for OLED display; notebook computers; display screens being video screens; digital signage; LED monitors; video screens; on -board computers being navigation apparatus for vehicles; head-up display apparatus being transparent electronic displays for vehicles; smartwatches; smartphones; organic light-emitting diode displays; electric control panels being instrument panels; computers; tablet PCs; televisions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |