USPTO serial 98606980
ENTERPRISE AI SIMPLIFIED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, DIANA ALANA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENTERPRISE AI SIMPLIFIED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brannon McKay
Brannon McKay Clayton, McKay & Bailey, PC800 Battery Ave SE, Suite 100Atlanta, GA 30339United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for artificial intelligence pipelines that are generated, deployed, tested, managed, and audited by the customer; Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for customer artificial intelligence pipelines that the customer defines, generates, deploys, tests, manages, and audits; Downloadable enterprise software for artificial intelligence pipelines that are generated, deployed, tested, managed, and audited by the customer | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence technology; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling customers to define, generate, deploy, test, manage, and audit artificial intelligence pipelines; Software development and product development consulting in the field of artificial intelligence; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for managed pipelines that include artificial intelligence models, prompts, datasets, and code; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for customer systems and applications, including customizable artificial intelligence pipelines; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for application backends, including artificial intelligence pipeline design and creation; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |