USPTO serial 98617251
SESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, KATHRYN ELISABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell J. Stock
Mitchell J. Stock Boyle Fredrickson SC840 N. Plankinton AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53203United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing access to digital music web sites on the Internet; delivery of digital music by electronic transmission, namely telecommunications; audio music broadcasting; audio broadcasting; broadcasting programs via a global computer network; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; electronic, electric, and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals and messages; radio broadcasting; satellite television broadcasting; streaming of audio material on the Internet; streaming of video material on the Internet; television broadcasting; transmission of sound via satellite or interactive multimedia networks; video broadcasting; video narrowcasting services; video teleconferencing; video-on- demand transmission services; voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) services; web conferencing services; webcasting services; Electronic transmission of data, namely downloadable and recorded computer programs via computer terminals on the Internet; broadcasting of audio, video, and multimedia content in the nature of television and radio programs; streaming of music, audio, images, video and other multimedia content over the internet, mobile devices, wireless networks and local and global computer networks and electronic communications networks; audio broadcasting of music; audio and video broadcasting of downloadable digital music, audio, video and multimedia content; wireless electronic transmission of downloadable digital music, audio, video and multimedia content; delivery of digital music, podcasts and audiovisual content by telecommunications services, namely the interent; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of podcasts; telecommunications services, namely streaming and transmission of podcasts; Streaming of audio material on the Internet; Streaming of video material on the Internet; data streaming; providing user access to a global computer network, namely, the internet for the downloading of computer software, computer programs, data files, data, namely, audio, music, image, video, Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI) files, and meta data, namely, electronically archived data used to describe the definition, structure and administration of aforesaid data files; electronic transmission of news, messages, namely, emails, text messages or instant messages, and information related to music, events; electronic transmission of news, information, images, music, video and data, namely, data associated with registered users' profiles and preferences related to music, video and entertainment, texts of all types, namely, text provided by the user via email, instant messaging or a website on the internet, over the Internet and other audio-visual media, namely, local/global computer networks; electronic data transmission services for audio, music, image, video, MIDI files and text, namely, personal information and messages between networked computer systems over the internet and local/global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |