USPTO serial 98620712
SOVRA PROCUREMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOVRA PROCUREMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Longueuil, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley K. Groff
Bradley K. Groff PERILLA KNOX & HILDEBRANDT LLP5871 Glenridge DriveSuite 350Atlanta, GA 30328Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Consulting services related to government procurement transactions, including access to tendering and business information and opportunities | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring online non-downloadable e-commerce software for processing government procurement transactions; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring online non-downloadable e-commerce software to allow users to perform government process-related transactions; Developing and implementing software solutions for facilitating governmental procurement processes; developing and implementing software solutions for facilitating the business processes of governmental entities with citizens, taxpayers, vendors, other governmental agencies, and non-governmental entities or organizations; Development and operation of Internet sites for others regarding procurement, buying, selling, and tendering information and opportunities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |