Drawing for QUALITY PLUS

USPTO serial 98622418

QUALITY PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHLEGELMILCH, JONATHON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUALITY PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Becker

Jeffrey M. Becker Haynes and Boone, LLP2801 N Harwood, Suite 2300Dallas, TX 75201United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business information services, namely, gathering and reviewing documentation and data related to quality for evaluating third-party vendors, suppliers, and contractors on behalf of othersACTIVE—
042Providing subscription-based temporary use of online non-downloadable software for gathering, screening, reporting risk management information, reporting implementation and compliance information, and reviewing documentation and data related to quality for evaluating third-party vendors, suppliers, and contractors on behalf of others; providing subscription-based temporary use of online non-downloadable software for gathering, analyzing, and evaluating regulatory compliance information on behalf of others in the field of vendor credentialing and management; providing subscription-based temporary use of online non-downloadable software for gathering, screening, reporting implementation and compliance information, and reviewing documentation and data related to quality management program implementation for evaluating third-party vendors, suppliers, and contractors on behalf of othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 14, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance