Drawing for COHERENCE

USPTO serial 98628940

COHERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FREEMAN, BREANNA SHALEISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COHERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn S. Toto

Carolyn S. Toto Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP725 S. Figueroa Street, 36th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90017-5524United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Radar antennas; Radar apparatus; Radar detectors; Radar displays; Radar machines and apparatus; Radar receivers with amplifiersACTIVE—
042Radar detection; Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research, design, analysis, testing, development, planning and consulting in the field of radar detection; Research in the field of over-the-horizon radar technology; Technical verification and validation of instrumentation radar systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 20, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 23, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Mar 31, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance