USPTO serial 98634673
RED GIANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED GIANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Thousand Oaks, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn, Esq.
Heather A. Dunn, Esq. DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105-2933United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Non-downloadable, software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely software for use in creating and processing 2D and 3D animations and graphics; non-downloadable, software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely software for use in the field of digital content creation for video editing, visual effects, computer graphics, motion graphics, audio visualization, architectural and product visualization, augmented reality video graphics, three-dimensional video graphics, video games, film, broadcast, and interactive applications; Non-downloadable, software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely software for image processing, photo imaging, motion graphics processing, and image editing; non-downloadable, software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely software for image, video, and digital content creation, editing, animating, visual effects and visualization; non-downloadable, software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely software for image, video, and digital content creation, editing, animating, visual effects and visualization featuring augmented reality, mixed reality, virtual reality, and interactivity; non-downloadable, software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely software for graphical user interface software; non-downloadable, software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely software for digital video processing; non-downloadable, software as a service (SaaS), and platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely software for film and motion picture editing, visual effects, computer graphics, and motion graphics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |