USPTO serial 98635489
NEUTROCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with NEUTROCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Taipei City, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elias Hantula
492 Wood Ridge AveWood Ridge, NJ 07075United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Beard clippers; Crimping irons; Curling tongs; Depilation appliances; Electric beard trimmers; Electric curling tongs; Electric depilatory appliances; Electric eyelash curlers; Electric hair clippers; Electric hair crimper; Electric hair curling irons; Electric hair cutters; Electric hair straightening irons; Electric hair styling irons; Electric hair trimmers; Electric hand-held hair styling irons; Electric manicure tools; Electric steam irons; Hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; Manicure sets, electric; Manicure tools; Nail buffers for use in manicure; Nail clippers, electric or non-electric; Nail files, electric; Non-electric curling irons; Non-electric hair clippers; Non-electric shavers; Pedicure sets; Plane irons; Razor blades; Razor knives; Scissors; Scissors adapted to receive attachment guide combs for hair cutting and trimming; Shaving cases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 25, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |