USPTO serial 98637635
NEO:LED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FORREST, ELIZABETH P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEO:LED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
P.O. Box 2910Merchant & Gould P.C.Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video screens; electric instrument panels being luminescent display panels; televisions; navigation apparatus for vehicles in the nature of on-board computers;TV, television, battery, video, LCD, LED, monitors; smartphones; smartwatches; LCD panels; LCDs being liquid crystal displays; LCD monitors; LCD large-screen displays; liquid crystal display (LCD) module; LCD monitor for computer; LCD monitor for notebook computers; digital signage; computers; tablet PCs; notebook computers; Head-up displays (HUDs) for vehicles, namely, transparent electronic displays for providing users with navigational and operational information; organic light-emitting diodes (OLED) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |