Drawing for COLLISION VISION

USPTO serial 98637688

COLLISION VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 748
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLLISION VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Antoinette M. Tease

Antoinette M. Tease Antoinette M. Tease, P.L.L.C.PO Box 1902Billings, MT 59103United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) featuring computer software for database management of automotive repair processesACTIVEOct 30, 2024

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 2, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 2, 2026EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 2, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2026EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2026TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 31, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2026EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 28, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance