USPTO serial 98638125
TRIDENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIRIGNANO, EMMA MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIDENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM E. ANDERSON
WILLIAM E. ANDERSON CHRISTENSEN, FONDER, DARDI & HERBERT PLLC11322 86TH AVENUE NORTHMAPLE GROVE, MN 55369UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Implantable orthopedic fixation device designed to be inserted across the sacroiliac joint used in orthopedic transplant and/or implant surgery; medical screw connections comprising one main screw and two integrated side screws to deliver three distinct screw approaches into a single trajectory intended for fusion of the sacroiliac joint for treating conditions including sacroiliac joint disruptions and degenerative sacroiliitis; bone screws for use in fusion of the sacroiliac joint; medical, surgical and orthopaedic implants made of metal designed to be inserted across the sacroiliac joint; sacroiliac joint transarticular fixation/arthrodesis implants; surgical implants made of articifial material intended for fusion of the sacroiliac joint comprising a main screw and two integrated side screws to deliver three distinct screw approaches into a single trajectory; surgical fixation system for fusion of the sacroiliac joint comprised of bone screws | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |