USPTO serial 98639109
SUPERFUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EMILO, LORI ANNE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERFUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent LaBarge
Brent LaBarge Universal Music Group2220 Colorado AvenueSanta Monica, CA 90404United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for accessing, displaying, distributing, downloading, playing, receiving, sampling, streaming, transmitting, uploading, generating, recording, mixing, reproducing, arranging, routing, and sequencing audio, video, and audiovisual content; Platform as a Service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for accessing, displaying, distributing, downloading, playing, receiving, sampling, streaming, transmitting, uploading, generating, recording, mixing, reproducing, arranging, routing, and sequencing audio, video, and audiovisual content; Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), namely, hosting software for accessing, displaying, distributing, downloading, playing, receiving, sampling, streaming, transmitting, uploading, generating, recording, mixing, reproducing, arranging, routing, and sequencing audio, video, and audiovisual content for use by others; providing online non-downloadable computer software for accessing, displaying, distributing, downloading, playing, receiving, sampling, streaming, transmitting, uploading, generating, recording, mixing, reproducing, arranging, routing, and sequencing audio, video, and audiovisual content; provision of websites featuring technology that enables users to access, display, distribute, download, play, receive, sample, stream, transmit, upload, generate, record, mix, reproduce, arrange, route, and sequence audio, video, and audiovisual content; technical support services, namely, monitoring, administration, and management of cloud computing and application systems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; computer programming; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; computer website design and graphics drawing, being graphic design; technical writing; creating, maintaining and hosting the web sites of others; graphic, website, and industrial design services for others; encryption of digital music in the nature of data encryption services; encoding of digital music; hosting of digital content on the internet or via a global computer network; design and development of computer hardware and software; maintenance and updating of computer software; design and development of multimedia products; graphic design; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to all of the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |