USPTO serial 98639352
NATUFLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHUTZ, MARISA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATUFLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PINCHINCHA, EC
Pinchincha, Quito, EC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Turgeon
Michael J. Turgeon Vedder Price P.C.222 North LaSalle StreetSuite 2500Chicago, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Flower seeds; Flower bulbs; Flower corms; Flowers; Dried flowers for decoration; Cut flowers; Live flower arrangements; Dried flower arrangements; Natural flowering plants; Wreaths of natural flowers; Natural plants and flowers; Live plants; Seeds for planting; Dried plants for decoration; Roses; Seedlings | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring flowers; Wholesale store services featuring flowers; Business consulting services in the field of floriculture; Import-export agencies in the field of floriculture; Online advertising services in the field of floriculture; Retail store services featuring floricultural products; Wholesale store services featuring floricultural products; Promoting the floricultural products of others by means of providing online portfolios via a website; Organization of flower and plant exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; Economic forecasting services for the floricultural industry based on crop analysis activities to assess crop yields and potential effectiveness of pest control and irrigation measures; Online retail store services in the field of floricultural products; Business consultancy services relating to product distribution, operation management services, logistics, supply chain and production systems for companies in the floricultural sector; Distributorship services in the field of floricultural products; Business advisory and consultancy services in the field of export of floricultural products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |