USPTO serial 98642398
DIGITIZING THE BUILT WORLD FOR A BETTER WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITIZING THE BUILT WORLD FOR A BETTER WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timur Slonim
Timur Slonim Law Office of Timur E. Slonim, Esq.86 Reno AveStaten Island, NY 10306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that provides computerized generation of digital three-dimensional representations of buildings and other facilities; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to access real-time data regarding operational status of physical devices connected to a computer network within a building or other facility; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that provides a three-dimensional virtual representation of a building or other facility; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software that collects and analyses data and provides recommendations for optimization of power consumption in buildings and other facilities; Hosting an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to access a computer interface which allows users to access real-time data regarding operational status of infrastructure within a building or other facility; Hosting an interactive web site featuring technology that enables users to access a computerized generation of reports that describe operation of physical infrastructure and human movements within a building or other facility | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |