USPTO serial 98646080
WRANGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOLK, DANA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WRANGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Clady
Susan E. Clady Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP127 Public Square, Suite 4900Cleveland, OH 44114-1284United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable computer application software for merchants to manage and track customer payments, track staff performance, and create promotional campaigns; downloadable computer software for creating advertising signage content for third parties; downloadable computer software for uploading transactional data to computer databases, providing statistical analysis, and producing notifications and reports in the field of transaction processing; downloadable computer software for streaming audiovisual media content via a global computer network and to mobile and digital electronic devices; downloadable computer software for generating streaming advertisements on the web sites of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | application service provider (ASP) services featuring online non-downloadable software for merchants to manage and track customer payments, track staff performance, and create promotional campaigns; application service provider featuring application programming interface (api) software for analyzing market data; application service provider featuring application programming interface (api) software for gathering market data; design and development of webpages featuring technology that enables users to collaboratively develop software; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software enabling users and systems to view and change data across software applications; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for allowing users to create, manage and share digital marketing campaigns; programming of software for others for market research purposes; providing a platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms that allow computer software developers to collaboratively develop software via a website; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable computer software for monitoring and reporting the data usage of electronic shopping carts; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for creating and disseminating advertisements for third parties in digital marketplaces; providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable software for data mining, data searching, data analysis, and data visualization; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software that enables users to connect, create, manage and share joint marketing campaigns; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for managing, reporting, tracking and automating email marketing of goods and services for others; software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for collaboratively developing software; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for communicating, collaborating, and sharing software applications among users via the internet; computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining an online website for others for controlling the distribution of software coding information to software developers to ensure the collaborative development of software for an online community website | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 5, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |