USPTO serial 98648412
EJAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EJAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Midland Park, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel M Redlich
758 De Camp DriveHillsborough, NJ 08844Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Apparel, namely, T-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, hoodies, jackets, pants and headgear, namely, hats, caps, and beanies designed for promotional and retail purposes, featuring the EJay brand logo and name, including casual wear and accessories aimed at promoting the brand's identity and lifestyle. | ACTIVE | Nov 29, 2023 |
| 034 | Electronic hemp vaping devices and refillable cartridges and solutions containing hemp extracts, including but not limited to, portable vape pens, desktop vaporizers, and associated refill cartridges containing hemp-derived liquids or concentrates. | ACTIVE | Nov 29, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |