Drawing for Q'RYKOS

USPTO serial 98648422

Q'RYKOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 748
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CERDA, VICTOR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Q'RYKOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold G. Furlow

Harold G. Furlow Harold G. Furlow Attorney at Law112 S. Country RoadSuite 208Bellport, NY 11713

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Cheese; Cream; Milk; Milk beverages containing fruits; Milk shakes; Nut milk-based beverages in the nature of cashew-based drinks; Processed peppers; Salads, namely, vegetable salad in vinegar; Sardines, not live; Chocolate milk; Cows' milk; Dried beans; Processed beans; Strawberry milkACTIVENov 24, 2006
030Cinnamon; Rice; Spices; Barley flour; Black pepper; Hot pepper powder; Pasta salad; Pepper powder; Processed herbs, namely, banana leaves; Unrefined sugar, namely, evaporated sugar cane juiceACTIVENov 24, 2006
032Horchata; Fruit juice; Soft drinks, namely, sodasACTIVENov 24, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 7, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 7, 2026EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 7, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2026EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2026EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 6, 2026EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 12, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 16, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 16, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 4, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance