USPTO serial 98650113
AUTOMAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON II, COLLIER L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOMAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas P. Coleman
Nicholas P. Coleman Dickinson Wright PLLC300 West Vine Street, Suite 1700Lexington, KY 40507United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Magnetic filtration systems in the nature of machines used for magnetic filtration in the automotive industry, the bearings industry, the steel processing industry, the machine tooling industry, the machine tool cutting industry, the aerospace industry, the chemical industry, the oil and gas industry, machine milling processes, machine grinding processes, machine honing processes, machine finishing processes, machine flushing processes, and in industrial wash systems, namely rotary washing systems, transfer wash systems, degreasing equipment, multi-stage wash systems, and spray wash systems; industrial filters in the nature of machines used for magnetic filtration in the automotive industry, the bearings industry, the steel processing industry, the machine tooling industry, the machine tool cutting industry, the aerospace industry, the chemical industry, the oil and gas industry, machine milling processes, machine grinding processes, machine honing processes, machine finishing processes, machine flushing processes, and in industrial wash systems, namely rotary washing systems, transfer wash systems, degreasing equipment, multi-stage wash systems, and spray wash systems; sub- micron filtration devices for the magnetic filtration of industrial fluids in precision machining and wash system applications; magnetic filtration systems for filtering magnetic particles from industrial machines comprising milling machines, gear lapping machines, turbocharger balancing machines, valve face grinding machines, crankshaft gun drills, camshaft grinders, cylinder liners, engine liner grinders, gear cutter and finishing machines, hub holding machines, ball grinding machines, super finish- polishing machines, ring grinders, raceway grinders, wash systems, rotary wash systems, transfer wash systems, degreasing equipment, multi stage washers, spray wash stations, steel rolling mills, sawing machines, steel pipe cutters, tube threading equipment, steel quenching tanks, surface treatment processing machines, spray bars, roller lubrication machines, final wash processes, deep hole drilling, VMC in the nature of vertical machining centers, HMC in the nature of horizontal machining centers, CNC machines in the nature of computer numerical controlled machines, multi axis vertical turning centres, EDM machines in the nature of electric discharge machining machines, laser cutters, multi axis CNC machines in the nature of computer numerical controlled machines, tungsten carbide drills and end mills, woodworking tools super finishes, mirror finish plastic cutters; skid mounted magnetic filtration systems in the nature of machines used for magnetic filtration in the automotive industry, the bearings industry, the steel processing industry, the machine tooling industry, the machine tool cutting industry, the aerospace industry, the chemical industry, the oil and gas industry, machine milling processes, machine grinding processes, machine honing processes, machine finishing processes, machine flushing processes, and in industrial wash systems, namely rotary washing systems, transfer wash systems, degreasing equipment, multi-stage wash systems, and spray wash systems; parts and fillings for all the aforesaid goods; none of the aforesaid being or being associated or used with crushing machines with a magnetic separator to separate concrete or other cementitious materials from metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and servicing of magnetic filtration systems; none of the aforesaid being associated or used with crushing machines with a magnetic separator to separate concrete or other cementitious materials from metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of magnetic filtration systems; testing and validation in the nature of diagnostic testing, product quality testing, and product safety testing services for magnetic filter equipment; none of the aforesaid being associated or used with crushing machines with a magnetic separator to separate concrete or other cementitious materials from metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |