USPTO serial 98650328
LIVIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANGOTTI, SALVATORE JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIVIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunnyvale, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacob M. Ward
Jacob M. Ward Ward Law Office LLC120 1/2 South Washington St, Suite 207Tiffin, OH 44883United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer programs using artificial intelligence (AI) for creating a visual inspection quality control system for use in manufacturing facilities to use in conjunction with quality control systems, the system comprised of the following subcomponents: search mechanisms based on specified quality control parameters to detect deviations during the manufacturing process, pretrained model selection incorporating AI to train quality control models, adaptations for transfer learning to create a customized quality control system; Recorded computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for creating and providing training for artificial intelligence models for a quality control system comprised of search mechanisms, pretrained model selection, adaptations for transfer learning for use in manufacturing facilities to use in conjunction with quality control systems. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) technology; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for creating and providing training for artificial intelligence models for use in manufacturing facilities quality control systems, the system comprised of the subcomponents: search mechanismsbased on specified quality control parameters to detect deviations during the manufacturing process, pretrained model selection incorporating AI to train quality control models, adaptations for transfer learning to create a customized quality control system; Research in the field of artificial intelligence (AI); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for a visual inspection system, creating and providing training for artificial intelligence models, search mechanisms, pretrained model selection, adaptations for transfer learning for use in manufacturing facilities to use in conjunction with quality control systems; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |