USPTO serial 98657631
WHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAYABYAB, EDWARD TAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gilroy, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zachary Strebeck
Zachary Strebeck Legal Moves PC1390 Market Street, Suite 200San Francisco, CA 94102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Downloadable game software; Downloadable computer game software; Downloadable computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; Downloadable computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Downloadable computer programs for video and computer games; Downloadable electronic game software; Downloadable electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Downloadable interactive game software; Downloadable video game software; Downloadable video and computer game programs | ACTIVE | Feb 18, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |