USPTO serial 98657880
FLOWCLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NISHIGAYA, CHRISTINE EIKO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLOWCLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J Peckham
Deborah J Peckham BARCLAY DAMON LLP160 Federal Street, 10th Floor160 Federal StreetBOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services in the nature of consulting services in the field of marketing, specializing in the use of data analytics and two-dimensional data codes; business consulting services, namely, providing businesses with consumer data analytics for marketing purposes; outsource service provider in the field of business analytics; Marketing research services featuring the use of consumer data and technology enabling analysis and prediction of consumer behavior through data analytics; advertising and promotional services utilizing two-dimensional data codes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring computer software for data analytics; software as service (SAAS) services featuring computer software that enables users to create customized landing pages and to create, manage, organize, use and track two- dimensional data codes and use two-dimensional data codes to connect users to digital content, information about products and services from third parties, social media accounts, email, text messages, and advertising for products and services from third parties; Computer services, namely, custom generation of two-dimensional data codes for others; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to create customized landing pages, and to create, manage, organize, use and track two-dimensional data codes and use two-dimensional data codes to connect users to digital content, information about products and services from third parties, social media accounts, email, text messages, and advertising for products and services from third parties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |