USPTO serial 98666483
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued a Notice of Allowance. To complete registration you generally need to file a Statement of Use or an extension request before the deadline.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $150
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine F. Hoffman
Catherine F. Hoffman Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC200 East Broward Blvd, Suite 2000Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing seminars in the field of deep learning methods and tools that are integrated into the tool flow of machine vision software and applications; Arranging and conducting of training workshops in the field of machine vision software training and deep learning application training; Holding and teaching courses, namely, providing teaching and course of instruction for deep learning methods and tools that are integrated into the tool flow of machine vision software and applications; Teaching in the field of deep learning methods and tools that are integrated into the tool flow of machine vision software and applications; Practical training in the field of deep learning methods and tools that are integrated into the tool flow of machine vision software and applications; Presentation of live training events in the field of deep learning methods and tools that are integrated into the tool flow of machine vision software and applications; Education services, namely, providing classes and instruction in the field of machine vision software and machine vision application; Training services in the field of machine vision software and machine vision application; Providing and holding courses of instruction in the field of machine vision software and machine vision application; Teaching in the field of machine vision software and machine vision application; Providing educational demonstrations, namely, practical training in the field of machine vision software and machine vision application; Presentation of live show performances related to machine vision software and machine vision application | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |