USPTO serial 98666991
SHOPPING MUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOPPING MUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francesca Silverman
Francesca Silverman Mastercard International Incorporated2000 Purchase StreetPurchase, NY 10577United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | software as a service (saas) services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software using generative artificial intelligence and machine learning; software as a service (saas) services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software using generative artificial intelligence and machine learning for research and analysis of data; software as a service (saas) services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software for machine-learning-based language and speech processing software; software as a service (saas) services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software for sharing datasets for the purpose of machine learning and predictive analytics; downloadable software for developing, running and analyzing algorithms that are able to learn to analyze, classify, and take actions in response to exposure to data; software as a service (saas) services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software with virtual assistant capabilities; software as a service (saas) services, namely, providing online non-downloadable software for data analysis, data processing, deep learning, generative artificial intelligence, generating text and graphics, and simulating conversations; software development services; software consulting services; research and development services in the field of generative artificial intelligence; research, design and development of software | ACTIVE | Jun 10, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |