CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FULLFORCE

USPTO serial 98670965

FULLFORCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STERLIN, DEBORAH L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULLFORCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hyunsoo Baek

Hyunsoo Baek Harvest IP Law LLP4208 Evergreen Ln, #232Annandale, VA 22003United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042design and development of computer video gaming peripherals; rental of computer video gaming hardware and data center facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2025ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 15, 2025CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 4, 2025EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2025ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 20, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 20, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 12, 2025ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 5, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance