USPTO serial 98671238
C CAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING,ROBERT E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 133
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C CAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sunny Isles Beach, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen G. Roberts
Kristen G. Roberts Trestle Law, APC3131 Camino Del Rio N.Suite 380San Diego, CA 92108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for use in managing internal server infrastructure, storage and network workloads, data centers and private clouds; Development of computer platforms; Electronic storage of data; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Hosting the web sites of others; Hosting the software, websites and other computer applications of others on a virtual private server; Maintenance of computer software; Providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in managing internal server infrastructure, storage and network workloads, data centers and private clouds; Software development in the field of cloud optimization artificial intelligence (AI) in the framework of software publishing; Technological research in the field of cloud optimization artificial intelligence (AI); Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for managing internal server infrastructure, storage and network workloads, data centers and private clouds; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for cloud optimization of artificial intelligence (AI) programs | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |