USPTO serial 98671841
OLIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DANG, PETER T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with OLIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tuttlingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Coury
George A. Coury Bachman & LaPointe, PC900 Chapel StreetSuite 1201New Haven, CT 06510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cleaning machines and mechanical cleaning apparatus for cleaning fryer systems and fryer equipment in restaurants and commercial kitchens; filtering machines and mechanical filtering apparatus, namely, filtering machines for chemical processing; filters as parts of cleaning machines; filter housings as parts of cleaning machines; portable filtering apparatus, namely, oil filters for motors and engines; all the aforesaid goods except those for domestic use, in particular not apparatus for purifying air and water | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Downloadable interface software for managing cleaning apparatus; computers for cleaning apparatus; Electronic testing apparatus, namely, cooking thermometers for testing used or filtered frying oil, not for medical purposes; Connecting parts in the nature of cable connectors and downloadable connecting software for connecting cleaning apparatus to the internet via interfaces for storing data via WLAN and wireless communication on the internet on an electronic storage device, such as a cloud or on local hard disks; Downloadable software for operating a cleaning apparatus; Downloadable control software for operating cleaning apparatus; all the aforesaid goods except those for household technology, in particular not including goods for purifying air and water | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Filters for cleaning machines and mechanical cleaning apparatus, namely, filtration units for filtering and treating cooking oil in the nature of edible and deep frying oils being part of commercial deep fryers; Filters, namely, filtration unit for filtering and treating cooking oil being part of commercial deep fryers for industrial and household use; all the aforesaid goods for cleaning edible and deep frying oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable interface software for managing a cleaning apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 19, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |