USPTO serial 98674662
FLAVOR BEAST BOOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RISO, MARK E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLAVOR BEAST BOOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RICHMOND HILL, ON, CA
RICHMOND HILL, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID L MAY
DAVID L MAY NIXON PEABODY LLP799 9TH STREET NW SUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Vaping products, namely, vaping pod systems being oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; vaping products, namely, vape pods being oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; pod mods being oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; vaping products, namely, disposable vaping pods being oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; cartridges sold filled with chemical flavourings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; electronic cigarettes; bottles in the nature of cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; cartridges sold filled with propylene glycol for electronic cigarettes; cartridges sold filled with vegetable glycerin for electronic cigarettes; chemical flavourings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; electronic rechargeable cigarette cases; vaping products, namely, electronic cigarettes for smoking purposes; electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2025 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2025 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |