Drawing for EXPLAINAI

USPTO serial 98674955

EXPLAINAI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WANG, YUAN YUAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPLAINAI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ryan A. Bethell

Ryan A. Bethell The Ideas Law Firm, PLLC975 E. Dava Dr.Tempe, AZ 85283United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for dynamically generating context-specific explanations based on learner interaction, tagged competencies, and performance history in the field of educational and job training softwareACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for delivering in-context, learner-adaptive instructional support integrated with a competency tracking system and real-time educational performance data in the field of educational and job training softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 8, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 28, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 28, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 21, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2025MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance