Drawing for GOOD RIDDANCE

USPTO serial 98676675

GOOD RIDDANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAYABYAB, EDWARD TAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD RIDDANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jared M. Barrett

Jared M. Barrett Seed IP Law Group LLP701 Fifth AvenueSuite 5400Seattle, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Fragrance refill cartridges for electric diffusers for air fragrancing preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 28, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance