USPTO serial 98678344
GATHR GEN AI FABRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GATHR GEN AI FABRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Gatos, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megha Bhouraskar
Megha Bhouraskar The Law Offices of Megha D. Bhouraskar P.C.70 Pine Street#5305New York, NY 10005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for building, managing, and deploying generative artificial intelligence applications; downloadable software for customizing large language models and foundation models for developing generative AI platforms; downloadable software for developing, training, and evaluating AI models using machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence; downloadable software for generating text, images, speech, sound, and video in response to natural language prompts; downloadable software for predictive analytics, natural language processing (NLP), and AI-powered user experiences; downloadable software for creating and generating software code using AI. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |